What you'll see after submitting

A programme cost model calibrated to your corridors, role mix, and screening depth.

01 Annual programme cost projection

Total annual cost across your hire volume and corridor mix.

Standard
Premium
Calibrated
02 Per-corridor cost breakdown

Where your spend concentrates by operating corridor.

IndiaStrong
PhilippinesMid
UAEMid
MexicoLow
BrazilLow
03 TAT vs cost trade-off

How accelerated turnaround changes the unit cost.

Premium TAT adds ~18% cost. Worth it on board-level hires.
Standard 7d Priority 4d Expedited 48hr

Cost Decision Engine

We built this tool for people running real screening programmes across offshore markets, not for casual browsers. Corporate email tells us you are one of them.

Quality filter, not a paywall. We want serious conversations, not spam.
Your email starts a conversation, not a mailing list.
Please use your corporate email. We require this to ensure our tools reach the right audience, not to gatekeep.

No spam. No mailing list. We may follow up once if the output suggests a conversation worth having. Privacy policy.

30+ MARKETS 10 CHECK TYPES OPERATOR-GRADE DATA
PRE-PROCUREMENT DECISION SYSTEM

Define your programme. See what it actually costs. Understand where it breaks before you sign.

This is not a calculator. It is a decision interface designed to be used before procurement begins. You will define your programme, receive an indicative cost range, and surface the operational risk, hidden cost structures, and failure points that vendor pricing never shows. The output is designed to change the conversation inside your organisation before a contract is signed.

30+ corridors · 10 verification types · Operator-grade intelligence · Updated May 2026
Programme Snapshot & Initial Assessment
Corridors
2 countries
Volume
120 / mo
Role mix
Ops, IT
Maturity
Scaling
Initial read: A scaling programme across multiple corridors. Coordination complexity and institutional access will shape the real cost more than the unit price.
Primary dependency: employer and institutional response timelines
Pressure point: coordination overhead across corridors
At scale: turnaround variance increases with volume
Moderate stress
Driven by multi-corridor coordination and reliance on verification sources with inconsistent response cycles.
Medium confidence
Inputs are partially defined. Add role types and review maturity selection for a sharper estimate.
Operator Warnings
A
Programme Scope
The corridors you operate in and the volume you process define the verification environment. Everything else follows from this.
Verification corridors 0 selected
Each corridor has its own institutional infrastructure, access constraints, and regulatory environment. Often underestimated.
Monthly candidate volume
Volume determines unit economics, team structure, and whether your programme gets dedicated analysts or a shared queue. Becomes critical at scale.
120 candidates / month
B
Role Complexity
Different roles require different verification depth. An operational hire and a finance director are not the same programme. The cost, the timeline, and the risk profile change with each role type you add.
Workforce role categories
Select every role type in your hiring programme. Multiple selections are expected. Common failure point.
C
Programme Maturity
Where your screening programme sits today determines cost reliability, risk exposure, and what to prioritise first. Be honest about your current state. Rarely visible upfront.
Early-stage / Fragmented
No centralised screening. Multiple vendors or ad hoc processes. Limited documentation. Compliance gaps exist but have not been tested.
Higher setup cost · Highest risk reduction value · Process design is the priority
Scaling / Multi-location
Expanding to new corridors or increasing volume. Some structure exists, but consistency across geographies is uneven. Documentation standards vary by location.
Coordination complexity is the cost driver · Consistency is the risk
Structured / Centralised
Centralised programme with defined SLAs, audit documentation, and consistent vendor management. Evaluating provider depth or consolidating vendors.
Lowest incremental cost · Quality sensitivity is highest · Depth over coverage
D
Check Package
Select the verification types for your programme. Minimum 3 checks per candidate. Two providers quoting the same list will deliver different rigour. The check name is identical. The verification depth is not.
Verification types 0 selected
Criminal is consultation-only: pricing varies by jurisdiction, scope, and local authority access.
Programme Analysis

What your configuration means

Select at least one country to see your programme analysis.
Next step

Next: review the programme briefing

Review the programme briefing → Or request a formal proposal