A screening programme is not evaluated in a single conversation. It is diagnosed, defined, measured, and then engaged. These tools are organised around that sequence, so the evidence builds before the commercial conversation starts.
Built for procurement, talent acquisition, TPRM & audit, and information security leaders.
Start with a Health Check →Two quick assessments that surface the gaps in your current screening model. No preparation required. The output tells you whether there is something to fix, and where.
Eight scored dimensions that produce an overall programme health score in 60 seconds. The result identifies which areas are strong and which need attention, and points you to the right next step.
Name your pressure point: turnaround, audit, scaling, cost, or vendor governance. This tool stress-tests your model against that specific concern and maps the failure sequence. Targeted, not broad.
Long-form reading and intelligence tools that define the standard your programme should meet. Architecture, coverage, compliance, and security: each addressed by a dedicated resource.
The structural blueprint for a screening programme that survives audit, scales across corridors, and closes cases without ambiguity. Twelve sections covering every layer from intake to closure.
Paste a job description and get a role-calibrated background check recommendation. The standard package is the floor; this returns the calibrated scope the role actually needs, with a free PDF you can share with the hiring team.
Select your hiring corridors and role types. The tool returns a structured view of the verification depth available in each country: where the source chain runs cleanly, and where it will shape the timeline.
The regulatory and contractual framework that governs how the programme operates. Data protection, consent architecture, cross-border transfer mechanisms, and audit trail requirements.
Technical security architecture: encryption, access control, network perimeter, vulnerability testing, and incident response. Written for the team that signs off on third-party data access.
Structured assessments that measure your current programme against the definitions from Stage 2. Each one produces a scored output that identifies exactly where you meet the standard and where you fall short.
Scores your programme across six structural dimensions: verification depth, regulatory alignment, SLA architecture, audit defensibility, data handling, and operational resilience. Broad, scored, instant.
Send this to your compliance or audit lead. Eight domains, 24 scored questions against GDPR Art. 28, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and DPDP Act. They complete the assessment; you get the structured input your evaluation needs.
Forward this to your CISO or security architect. Eight domains covering data architecture, encryption, access control, incident response, and continuity. Scored on a 0 to 3 maturity scale mapped to NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, and CIS Controls v8.
By this point, you have diagnosed the gaps, understood the standard, and measured against it. These tools convert that evidence into a commercial conversation: cost modelling, a structured briefing, and a formal proposal.
Configure countries, volume, and role complexity. The calculator returns an indicative monthly range for your programme, shaped by volume tier, jurisdictional complexity, and the checks that actually apply.
A structured overview of the programme designed for internal circulation. Covers methodology, SLA framework, compliance posture, and the commercial model in a format that all four stakeholder groups review together.
Request a formal proposal shaped by the diagnostics and assessments already completed. The proposal arrives pre-configured to the corridors, volumes, and compliance requirements surfaced through the earlier stages.
Long-form reading for the reviewer who wants the context behind the tools. Regional deep dives, regulatory updates, glossary.